<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: friendfeed or social thing? or are lifestreams a waste of time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:04:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-17113</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-17113</guid>
		<description>the short answer is not right now - I&#039;ll give a more detailed answer in the next few posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the short answer is not right now &#8211; I&#039;ll give a more detailed answer in the next few posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-21777</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-21777</guid>
		<description>the short answer is not right now - I&#039;ll give a more detailed answer in the next few posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the short answer is not right now &#8211; I&#039;ll give a more detailed answer in the next few posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-17112</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-17112</guid>
		<description>Please tell us more about what life stream aggregators do vs. standard social networking like Facebook? Should I join one these services?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell us more about what life stream aggregators do vs. standard social networking like Facebook? Should I join one these services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-21776</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-21776</guid>
		<description>Please tell us more about what life stream aggregators do vs. standard social networking like Facebook? Should I join one these services?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell us more about what life stream aggregators do vs. standard social networking like Facebook? Should I join one these services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-17111</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-17111</guid>
		<description>Think I am contradicting myself in this post somewhat - I prefer the ability to message back into the orginal service, and yet I am saying that users would not have to sign up for the various services. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Does that mean friendfeed is better for mainstream users?  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I think I end up with the life stream aggregator being integrates at the OS or browser level (ie not a website) and all these services being able to be signed into using openID (which would allow the commenting.  &lt;/br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think I am contradicting myself in this post somewhat &#8211; I prefer the ability to message back into the orginal service, and yet I am saying that users would not have to sign up for the various services. </p>
<p> Does that mean friendfeed is better for mainstream users?  </p>
<p> I think I end up with the life stream aggregator being integrates at the OS or browser level (ie not a website) and all these services being able to be signed into using openID (which would allow the commenting.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://www.riazkanani.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-21775</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-21775</guid>
		<description>Think I am contradicting myself in this post somewhat - I prefer the ability to message back into the orginal service, and yet I am saying that users would not have to sign up for the various services.  Does that mean friendfeed is better for mainstream users?   I think I end up with the life stream aggregator being integrates at the OS or browser level (ie not a website) and all these services being able to be signed into using openID (which would allow the commenting.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think I am contradicting myself in this post somewhat &#8211; I prefer the ability to message back into the orginal service, and yet I am saying that users would not have to sign up for the various services.  Does that mean friendfeed is better for mainstream users?   I think I end up with the life stream aggregator being integrates at the OS or browser level (ie not a website) and all these services being able to be signed into using openID (which would allow the commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
